#
SAMA licenses payment service providers and payment system operators under the Law of Payments and Payment Services and its Implementing Regulations (PFMI-aligned). An updated supervisory framework (self-assessment + supervisory assessment methodology) now governs payment systems and operators, replacing the prior framework, with scope tied explicitly to the Payment Systems and Services Law (Royal Decree M/26).
The non-bank route is itself tiered. The SAMA non-bank PSP licence taxonomy comprises four licence types with capital thresholds: Micro PI (SAR 1m, capped at SAR 20,000 per customer per month), Major PI (SAR 3m, cross-border permitted), Micro EMI (SAR 2m) and Major EMI (SAR 10m); the PI/EMI distinction turns on whether the entity may issue electronic money. The Major PI tier is the designated cross-border route, and the per-customer monthly cap on the Micro PI tier directly shapes how a low-cost entrant can scale before stepping up to the Major tier. Capital thresholds and per-customer caps thus directly shape market-access strategy for non-bank entrants, and they keep the non-bank PI/EMI route analytically distinct from the bank-PSP route under the Banking Control Law M/5. These capital thresholds and activity caps rest in part on specialist law-firm commentary corroborated against the SAMA implementing regulation.
Outlook
The licensing perimeter is stable and codified, and the binary bank-versus-non-bank distinction is the structural fact framing every downstream module in the Saudi baseline. Future cycles should watch for any capital-threshold or activity-cap revisions to the four-tier taxonomy, and for the entry of newly licensed non-bank operators ascending the Micro-to-Major ladder.
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
Saudi Arabia's payments licensing perimeter underwent a structural reset this cycle. SAMA issued Circular No. 472047719 on 8 March 2026, replacing the 2021 Oversight Framework for Payment Systems and Their Operators with a revised framework governing how payment systems and their operators are authorised and supervised under the Payments and Payment Services Law. This is not a minor procedural update: a wholesale replacement of the oversight framework resets the baseline supervisory document against which every licensed payment-system operator in the Kingdom is assessed, and it typically signals that the regulator has accumulated enough operational experience under the prior framework to identify where the authorisation and supervisory requirements needed tightening or clarification.
The clearest practical expression of that shift is open banking's move from sandbox to licensed commercial activity. On 27 March 2026, SAMA granted Lean Technologies its first Major Payment Institution licence specifically for open banking, and SAMA formally announced the start of open-banking licensing on 30 March 2026. Until this point, open banking in Saudi Arabia had operated under a more constrained, sandbox-style arrangement; the Lean Technologies licence is the first instance of a firm being authorised to conduct open-banking activity as a standing commercial Major Payment Institution rather than as a sandboxed participant. This is a market-access event in the fullest sense: it establishes the authorisation pathway that subsequent open-banking entrants will follow, and it signals to the broader fintech sector that SAMA considers the open-banking use case mature enough to license at scale rather than continuing to pilot it indefinitely.
The scale of uptake that followed is notable. At Money20/20 Middle East in September 2026, SAMA's Governor stated that more than 307 entities now operate under the open-banking framework. That figure, delivered only months after the first licence was granted, indicates that the regulatory architecture built around Circular No. 472047719 and the Lean Technologies precedent was already supporting a substantial population of participants rather than a handful of early movers. It also suggests that a meaningful pool of firms had been positioning themselves for licensed open-banking status before the framework opened, consistent with a sandbox cohort having been readied for graduation into commercial licensing.
Taken together, the revised oversight framework and the open-banking licensing launch represent the most significant market-access development in the Saudi payments sector this cycle. The revised framework is the structural instrument; the open-banking licensing is its most visible downstream consequence. Firms assessing market entry into the Kingdom's payments sector should treat the March 2026 circular as the current authoritative statement of SAMA's oversight expectations for payment systems and operators, superseding the 2021 framework in its entirety, and should treat the Lean Technologies licence as the reference precedent for how an open-banking-focused Major Payment Institution application is likely to be assessed going forward.
Outlook
The pace at which open-banking licensing attracted participants, 307 entities within roughly six months of the first licence, suggests SAMA is likely to continue processing open-banking and other Major Payment Institution applications at a brisk tempo rather than treating Lean Technologies as an isolated flagship grant. Market participants should watch for further SAMA statements quantifying licensing uptake, and for any second or third wave of named licensees that would confirm the framework is scaling beyond its first mover. The revised oversight framework issued under Circular No. 472047719 should be read as the durable baseline against which future licensing activity will be assessed until SAMA next revises it; given the pace of change demonstrated this cycle, a further revision inside the next eighteen to twenty-four months is plausible, as scheduled, should the open-banking cohort's growth or risk profile prompt recalibration of the supervisory requirements.
1 earlier distinct update(s)
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
Saudi Arabia's open banking market access framework crossed a structural threshold this cycle. The Saudi Central Bank (SAMA) commenced formal licensing of fintech companies to provide open banking services, granting first licences to two fintech firms on 26 March 2026. This followed completion of the regulatory sandbox phase, meaning the licensed firms had already operated under supervised, time-bound experimental conditions before qualifying for standing licensed status. The distinction between sandbox participation and formal licensure matters for market-access analysis: sandbox status confers a bounded, revocable permission to test a service, while formal licensing under SAMA confers an ongoing authorised-activity status subject to the full weight of SAMA's supervisory regime.
The statutory basis for this licensing action is the Law of Payments and Payment Services, the governing statute that defines Payment Services, Payment Systems, and the licensable activities that sit under SAMA's Board-issued Regulations. This is the same statutory perimeter that governs both bank and non-bank payment institutions operating in the Kingdom, and the open-banking licences granted this cycle sit within the non-bank payment-institution and electronic-money-institution category rather than the bank-supervised category, an important distinction for understanding which prudential and conduct requirements attach to the newly licensed firms.
The practical significance of this development extends beyond the two named licensees. Having built and operated a functioning sandbox-to-licence pathway for open banking specifically, SAMA has demonstrated a repeatable regulatory-maturation model that other sandboxed fintech categories, whether in payments-adjacent services, digital-asset infrastructure, or other emerging categories, could plausibly follow. This is a confirmed-confidence, high-impact finding directly sourced to the Saudi Press Agency and SAMA's own media centre, giving it strong evidentiary weight for a market-access development.
Outlook
The next marker to watch is whether SAMA extends formal licensing to additional open-banking applicants beyond the initial two firms, and whether any other sandboxed fintech category shows signs of following the same sandbox-to-licence trajectory. The regulatory perimeter question, specifically how non-bank payment institutions and electronic-money institutions are treated relative to banks under the same licensing regime, remains a useful analytical lens for tracking how the licensed open-banking category matures.
1 further periodic run re-emitted the standing brief unchanged and is not shown.
Sources and findings (5)
- T1https://rulebook.sama.gov.sa/en/law-payments-and-payment-servicesretrieved
- T1https://rulebook.sama.gov.sa/en/implementing-regulations-payments-and-payment-services-lawretrieved
- T3https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=36edd3a6-fb14-4556-abe1-39c321cc7dberetrieved
- T1https://rulebook.sama.gov.sa/en/guidelines-apply-payment-service-providers-licenseretrieved
- T3https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/financial-services-regulation-2025/saudi-arabiaretrieved