#
CZ crypto-asset services now exclusively under CNB MiCA CASP authorisation as of 1 July 2026; legacy Trade Licensing Act VASP registration route expired; 11 entities authorised of 251 applications assessed.
Entities that lack CASP authorisation, including Binance, must now cease providing crypto-asset services in the Czech Republic and the wider European Union from that date, since Binance was unable to complete its pending application to the Greek regulator in time.
CNB's assessment found that a large share of the 251 applications was insufficient or lacking documentation, with many submitted by entities without a verifiable track record or registered only at virtual addresses, reflecting a stringent gatekeeping posture for market entry.
Outlook
The completion of the MiCA transition, with only eleven of 251 applications approved, points to a stringent CNB gatekeeping posture likely to reduce materially the population of authorised crypto-asset service providers in the Czech market.
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
Czechia's licensing and market-access landscape for payment and e-money institutions this cycle is shaped entirely by an upstream EU legislative event rather than a domestic action. The European Parliament and Council reached final political agreement on the Third Payment Services Directive, PSD3, and its companion Payment Services Regulation, PSR, with the agreed compromise texts published on 23 April 2026. This package repeals and replaces the existing PSD2 and EMD2 frameworks EU-wide, and it directly affects Czechia as an EU Member State because the Czech National Bank functions as the national competent authority for both payment institutions and electronic-money institutions, in addition to its separate role as MiCA competent authority for crypto-asset service providers.
The distinction between the Directive and Regulation components matters for how CZ-licensed firms should read the transposition timeline. Legal commentary reviewed this cycle indicates Member States are required to transpose the Directive component within eighteen months of its entry into force, while the Regulation component, being directly applicable EU law by design, would take effect without a separate national transposition act once in force. For Czechia specifically, no draft implementing legislation, Ministry of Finance consultation, or CNB public timetable was located this cycle. That absence is itself notable given the compressed window: eighteen months from entry into force is not an unlimited runway, and the absence of visible domestic preparatory activity this early in the cycle means CZ-licensed PIs and EMIs currently have no confirmed domestic milestone to plan against beyond the EU-level deadline itself.
Both CZ-licensed bank-affiliated payment providers and non-bank payment institutions and e-money institutions are within scope of this transition, since PSD3/PSR is explicitly framed as applying across the existing PSD2/EMD2 population without carving out either category. The sourcing base for this finding, however, is limited to Tier-3 law-firm secondary commentary, Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer, Freshfields, and Norton Rose Fulbright, rather than the primary EU Council or Commission text or any Czech government source; no Tier-1 anchor specific to Czechia's implementation was retrieved this cycle, which is a genuine gap rather than a settled absence of Czech-specific activity.
Outlook
The eighteen-month transposition clock, running from PSD3's entry into force, is the structural deadline to track for Czechia specifically; the next useful marker would be a Czech Ministry of Finance consultation paper or CNB public notice setting out the domestic implementation sequence, neither of which had surfaced as of this cycle. Illustrative orientation only, not a prediction: the EU-wide expectation reviewed in commentary is that existing PI and EMI authorisations will be grandfathered pending re-authorisation under the new framework rather than lapsing outright, though Czech-specific confirmation of that treatment remains outstanding and should be checked for directly against CNB guidance in a subsequent cycle.
1 earlier distinct update(s)
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
The Czech Republic's crypto-asset licensing perimeter underwent a structural transition this cycle as the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regime became the sole basis for crypto-asset service provision. The Czech National Bank completed its MiCA crypto-asset-service-provider (CASP) authorisation process, granting authorisation to eleven entities out of 251 applications assessed by 1 July 2026. This is a nonbank licensing development: CASP authorisation sits alongside, but distinct from, the Payment Institution and Electronic Money Institution licensing categories that the CNB also supervises, and it replaces the legacy Trade Licensing Act route under which crypto-asset businesses previously operated without a dedicated financial-services authorisation regime.
The market-access consequence is immediate and binding. Entities without MiCA CASP authorisation, including Binance, may no longer provide crypto-asset services in the Czech Republic or the wider European Union from 1 July 2026; Binance specifically is named as pending a Greek-regulator application that it did not complete in time to preserve continuity of service. This is a critical-impact market-access event: a globally significant crypto-asset service provider has been required to exit the Czech and EU market as a direct consequence of the authorisation deadline, illustrating that the MiCA transition functions as a hard market-access gate rather than a phased or discretionary one.
The quality bar behind the eleven-entity authorisation outcome is itself a market-access signal. A large share of the 251 applications assessed by the CNB were found insufficient or lacking documentation, including submissions from entities without a verifiable track record or with virtual-address registered offices. This points to the CNB applying a genuinely stringent fit-and-proper and documentation standard rather than treating MiCA transition as a pro forma relicensing exercise for incumbent operators, a posture that has direct implications for any prospective entrant assessing the realistic cost and timeline of securing Czech CASP authorisation.
Beneath the CASP tier, the Czech Small Payment Institution (SPI, mala platebni instituce) registration remains an active, distinct nonbank market-access route, taxed at the 21 percent corporate income rate and operating separately from full Payment Institution or Electronic Money Institution authorisation. The anticipated PSD3/PSR legislative package is expected to tighten the standards applicable to this lighter-touch route, though this specific finding rests on a single Tier-4 vendor source and has not been independently corroborated this cycle. The juxtaposition is notable: while CASP authorisation now imposes a materially higher market-entry bar for crypto-asset services, the SPI route continues to offer a comparatively light-touch domestic registration pathway for smaller payment-services entrants, and the compliance-intensity gap between the two regimes is likely to narrow only once PSD3/PSR implementation specifically reaches the SPI tier. Both the CASP and SPI regimes analysed here sit on the nonbank side of the Czech payments and crypto-asset market-access map; no bank-channel licensing development surfaced this cycle to set against them, and that distinction is likely to remain a structural feature of Czech nonbank market-access analysis for as long as MiCA and PSD3/PSR proceed on separate but parallel tracks.
Outlook
Watch for whether the roughly 240 CASP applicants not authorised in this round pursue authorisation in another EU jurisdiction under MiCA's single-passport structure, which would be a clear regulatory-arbitrage signal within the harmonised EU crypto-licensing market, and for whether PSD3/PSR implementation timelines begin to bring visible change to the Small Payment Institution registration standard.
Sources and findings (6)
- T1https://www.cnb.cz/en/supervision-financial-market/conduct-of-supervision/status-of-supervision/supervision-of-payment-institutions-and-electronic-money-institutions/retrieved
- T1https://www.cnb.cz/en/supervision-financial-market/conduct-of-supervision/licensing-and-approval-proceedings/licensing-and-approval-proceedings-payment-institutions/retrieved
- T3https://arws.cz/news-at-arrows/emd2-and-psd2-in-practiceretrieved
- T3https://arws.cz/news-at-arrows/cnb-license-for-foreign-companiesretrieved
- T1https://www.cnb.cz/en/cnb-news/press-releases/CNB-issues-the-first-six-authorisations-under-the-MiCA-Regulation-00001/retrieved
- T2https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/fintech-2026/czech-republicretrieved