#
Canada has no BC-specific payment-institution licensing regime. The federal Retail Payment Activities Act (RPAA), supervised by the Bank of Canada, is the sole applicable payment-services supervisory framework for payment service providers operating in or into British Columbia. The RPAA's supervisory perimeter reached fuller operational maturity in this window: the first annual PSP report cycle closed (due 31 March 2026) and the Bank of Canada added a public enforcement-transparency mechanism (June 2026).
Outlook
Bill C-12's universal enrolment requirement, layered onto the existing FINTRAC MSB and RPAA PSP registration floors, will add a further federal compliance layer for CA-BC market entrants without displacing the province's dual-track structure.
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
The Bank of Canada's Retail Payment Activities Act supervisory framework reached operational maturity this cycle, marking a shift from phased commencement toward full ongoing supervision that applies directly to payment service providers operating in or into British Columbia. Two developments define this shift. First, RPAA-registered PSPs' first annual compliance report to the Bank of Canada was due by 31 March 2026, covering the risk-management and end-user funds-safeguarding frameworks that all registered PSPs must maintain. This closes the first full annual reporting cycle under the regime and establishes a baseline against which future compliance reporting will be measured. Second, on 12 June 2026 the Bank of Canada announced it will begin publishing Notices of Violation issued to PSPs under the RPAA, with enforcement decisions remaining public for five years and noted directly on a PSP's public registry entry. This new enforcement-transparency mechanism materially raises the reputational stakes of any compliance failure, since violations will no longer be a private matter between the PSP and the regulator but a matter of public record tied to the PSP's registry standing.
Alongside these two headline developments, PSPs continue to operate under a standing change-notification obligation: any significant change to how a PSP conducts a retail payment activity, or the commencement of a new activity, must be notified to the Bank of Canada at least five business days in advance. The statutory basis for the whole framework, the Retail Payment Activities Act (S.C. 2021, c. 23), is confirmed current as of 21 June 2026, last amended 26 March 2026, having been approved by Parliament in June 2021 and brought into force in stages through September 2025. The phased-commencement period that has characterised the RPAA's rollout since 2021 is therefore now substantially behind it, with the regime operating as a mature, ongoing supervisory framework applicable equally to bank and non-bank payment service providers, though this cycle's evidence does not distinguish differential treatment between bank-affiliated and non-bank PI/EMI-type PSPs specifically.
Outlook
The accumulation of published Notices of Violation over the coming cycles, beginning from the 12 June 2026 transparency-mechanism launch, is the clearest item to watch. As enforcement decisions accumulate on the public registry, PSPs operating in British Columbia will gain a growing body of precedent against which to benchmark their own risk-management and safeguarding-framework compliance, while facing materially higher reputational exposure for any future violation than existed under the pre-transparency regime.
2 earlier distinct update(s)
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
British Columbia's Financial Services Authority (BCFSA) will assume regulatory responsibility for money services businesses under the Money Services Businesses Act, a confirmed, Tier-1-sourced development this cycle. BCFSA will appoint a Superintendent of Money Services Businesses holding investigation, ordering and administrative-penalty powers of up to $100,000, explicitly modelled on FINTRAC's existing powers under the PCMLTFA. This creates a new provincial licensing and authorisation layer for nonbank payment institutions and money-transmission businesses operating in BC, sitting alongside rather than replacing the existing federal FINTRAC registration regime.
The Act's statutory scope, per specialist legal commentary, defines money services as foreign exchange dealing, remitting or transmitting funds, and issuing or redeeming travellers cheques and money orders. A defined set of entities is exempt from the new registration requirement: insurance companies, savings institutions, trust companies, securities dealers, casinos and Crown corporations. This scoping matters for market-access planning because it clarifies which nonbank payment-company business models fall inside the new provincial perimeter and which regulated entity types are carved out.
The critical open item is timing. Although the Act received royal assent on May 11, 2023, the coming-into-force date and the corresponding registration deadline for the approximately 578 affected BC-based money services businesses remain formally undetermined as of this cycle. This is an enacted-but-not-yet-fully-operational regime: the statutory authority exists, but the practical registration obligation has not yet crystallised into a firm compliance date for the payment companies it will affect.
Outlook
The coming-into-force date announcement is the single most consequential near-term event for BC's nonbank payment-company licensing perimeter. Once announced, it will convert the current preparatory period into a firm registration deadline for roughly 578 BC-based MSBs under BCFSA's new Superintendent. Payment companies and their advisers should treat the interim period as a compliance-readiness window, tracking both the coming-into-force announcement itself and any BCFSA guidance clarifying registration procedure ahead of that date.
Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access
The Retail Payment Activities Act's ongoing compliance regime is now a lived operational reality rather than a forward commitment. Risk-management, funds-safeguarding, incident-response, and annual-reporting obligations have applied to registered payment service providers since September 8, 2025, and the first annual reports under this regime were due no later than March 31, 2026. The Bank of Canada, as supervisor, holds an enforcement toolkit running from warning letters through administrative monetary penalties of up to ten million Canadian dollars, with registration revocation available as the most severe sanction — a toolkit disclosed through specialist legal commentary rather than a directly quoted primary enforcement-policy document, though the underlying statutory authority for these powers is itself Tier 1.
In June 2026, the Bank of Canada published updated registration criteria clarifying the holding-of-funds payment-function test that determines whether an entity must register under the RPAA. This is a primary-source, Tier-1 development, and it matters because the holding-of-funds test is the operative line determining which payment functions bring an entity within scope of the entire RPAA compliance regime — the safeguarding, incident-response, and reporting obligations only attach once an entity crosses that registration threshold. All of the entities captured under this framework to date are classified as non-bank payment institutions and e-money issuers rather than deposit-taking banks; the RPAA is specifically designed as a non-bank payment-service-provider oversight regime that operates alongside, rather than in place of, existing prudential bank supervision. This bank/non-bank distinction is structurally important: a deposit-taking bank offering payment functions is supervised through its existing prudential channel, while a non-bank PSP offering the same functional payment service is captured through this newer RPAA registration and reporting architecture.
This module is treated as a standing-brief content-tier topic rather than a dated dashboard entry, reflecting its status as an ongoing regulatory framework rather than a single dated event. It is worth flagging that the primary text of the RPAA Regulations themselves has not been independently retrieved for several of this cycle's findings, which currently rest on law-firm and trade-press secondary summaries rather than directly quoted statutory or regulatory text; that gap does not undermine the high confidence assigned to the core in-force obligations, which are corroborated by the primary Bank of Canada registration-criteria publication, but it does mean granular procedural detail beyond the headline obligations should be treated as provisional pending primary retrieval.
Outlook
The registration-criteria clarification published in June 2026 is likely to prompt scope-determination reviews among payment entities uncertain whether their specific fund-holding arrangements bring them within the RPAA's registration requirement; entities that conclude they are newly in scope will need to build out the safeguarding, incident-response, and annual-reporting infrastructure already operative for registered entities since September 2025. Watch for the Bank of Canada's first public enforcement actions under its administrative-penalty toolkit, which would be the first concrete test of how the up-to-ten-million-dollar penalty ceiling is applied in practice.
Sources and findings (6)
- T1https://fintrac-canafe.canada.ca/msb-esm/msb-eng
- T1https://www.bankofcanada.ca/regulatory-oversight/retail-payments/
- T1https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/justice/anti-money-laundering/quick-glance-government-actions
- T1https://www.bcbudget.gov.bc.ca/2024/sp/pdf/agency/bcfsa.pdfretrieved
- T1https://www.bankofcanada.ca/core-functions/retail-payments-supervision/supervisory-framework-registration/retrieved
- T2https://www.blg.com/en/insights/2026/04/preparing-for-universal-enrolment-higher-penalties-and-fintrac-enforcement