#
Non-bank payment services in Cameroon operate under the CEMAC/BEAC dual PSP/EMI licensing framework; Order No. 080/CAB of 28 May 2025 tightened the statutory definition of 'electronic means of payment', pulling any electronically-stored monetary value (including simple prepaid balances) squarely into EMI-regulated territory and narrowing PSP-licence structuring room.
This finding is confirmed at high confidence, sourced from legal-commentary reporting on the payment-service-provider-versus-electronic-money-issuer distinction in Cameroon, though it rests on a single T3 source and the primary text of Order No. 080/CAB itself was not directly retrieved this cycle. Market commentary associated with the reform points to rising capital-threshold expectations for payment-service-provider licensing, reported to be approaching the order of 500 million FCFA, though this figure should be treated as indicative market reporting rather than a confirmed statutory threshold pending retrieval of the primary legal text.
This development also sharpens the bank-versus-non-bank distinction that runs through Cameroon's payments landscape. Banks, which are prudentially supervised institutions in their own right, are less directly affected by the redefinition than non-bank payment institutions and electronic-money issuers, for whom the redefinition is the more consequential development: a non-bank PI/EMI now bears a materially narrower path to operating stored-value products without full EMI licensing than it did before Order No. 080/CAB, whereas a licensed bank offering the same functionality was arguably always within EMI-adjacent supervisory scope. Any market-access assessment for Cameroon should therefore differentiate explicitly between a bank-led entry strategy, which is comparatively less exposed to this cycle's redefinition, and a non-bank PI/EMI-led strategy, which now faces the most direct impact of the tightened definition.
Outlook
What would most change this assessment next cycle is retrieval of the primary text of Order No. 080/CAB, which would allow the reported capital-threshold figures to be confirmed or revised, and clarity on how the redefinition is being applied in practice to existing prepaid and stored-value products already operating in the Cameroonian market.
No new data since the standing brief. 1 periodic run re-emitted it unchanged.
Sources and findings (7)
- T1https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=d9c478ed-6761-4988-812a-c78c4813a22dretrieved
- T3https://primetimelawoffice.com/how-to-obtain-payment-service-license-cameroon/retrieved
- T1https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=d9c478ed-6761-4988-812a-c78c4813a22dretrieved
- T2https://www.lawyard.org/blog-articles/cameroon-enforces-fintech-licensing-rule-as-august-2025-deadline-passes/retrieved
- T2https://launchbaseafrica.com/2025/06/16/fintech-unicorn-wave-has-landed-in-central-africa-but-so-has-a-regulatory-storm/retrieved
- T3https://www.legal500.com/guides/chapter/cameroon-fintech/retrieved
- T1https://dgtcfm.cm/en/microfinance-institution-licensing-cameroon/retrieved