title: Uganda Payments Regulation Monitor | World Payments Monitor canonical: https://payments.gi/jurisdictions/uganda/ date_modified: 2026-10-21 publisher: Asymmetric Intelligence # Uganda UG schema world-payments-v1 trajectory: not yet assessed Last updated 2026-10-21 · 14 modules · 73 sourced findings · 35 sources in the cumulative register 14 Modules baseline.modules[] 73 Findings modules[].findings[] 2 Tier-1 sources run_metadata.t1_source_count Confidence mix (sums to 14 rendered modules; click to filter) No modules moved this cycle. ## Jurisdiction brief ###### Latest update · 11 October 2026 #### Lead Signal The only material development for Uganda this period is a commercial-intelligence finding: MAM Telecom Ltd secured a USD 250,000 grant from an unnamed private South African individual investor, announced 8 October 2026, to fund mobile-money float infrastructure build-out and regulatory licensing ahead of a planned Uganda launch. MAM Telecom itself stated that the proceeds will be spent on regulatory licensing, hiring technical and operations staff, building its platform, and setting up risk and compliance systems. This is a confirmed capital-commitment event at an early, pre-launch stage rather than a disclosed institutional funding round, and it is explicitly earmarked in part for regulatory compliance costs rather than purely for product development. #### Other Developments **A grant-stage rather than venture-stage signal.** The USD 250,000 figure positions this development firmly at the grant or seed-adjacent end of the capital-raising spectrum rather than as evidence of institutional venture interest in Uganda's payments market. The investor is described only as an unnamed private South African individual, which limits what can be said about cross-border investor appetite for Uganda's payments sector beyond this single data point. #### Cross-Monitor Connections MAM Telecom's stated intention to direct grant proceeds toward regulatory licensing and compliance systems is relevant to Uganda's payments-licensing architecture under the National Payment Systems Act and its 2021 regulations, which assign Bank of Uganda as sole supervisor; however, no new licensing instrument or BoU rule change was identified within the search budget available this cycle, so that architecture is noted as context rather than as a tracked development here. Readers tracking Uganda's data-protection enforcement posture, including the PDPO's cross-border-transfer equivalence doctrine applied against multinational platforms, should consult the data-protection monitor, as that enforcement activity is independent of this cycle's payments-sector finding. #### Outlook The development to watch is whether MAM Telecom's licensing application proceeds to a disclosed outcome with Bank of Uganda, which would convert this grant-stage commercial-intelligence finding into a tracked licensing or market-access development. Uganda's broader payments regulatory architecture remained stable this period, with no Bank of Uganda primary-source publication located for licensing, safeguarding, or mobile-money rule changes within the available search window; that absence is logged as a coverage gap rather than a confirmed no-change position. _2 earlier updates not shown here._ ###### Standing brief · as of 4 August 2026 _Written before the update above. Where they differ, the update is the more recent position._ #### Lead Signal Bank of Uganda has imposed new over-the-counter cash-withdrawal caps effective 1 January 2027, setting individual limits at UGX 50 million per day (UGX 250 million per week) and corporate limits at UGX 500 million per day (UGX 2.5 billion per week). Concurrently, interbank cheque value thresholds are being halved, with the local-currency ceiling falling from UGX 10 million to UGX 5 million, running alongside the cash-withdrawal policy. Bank of Uganda has framed the cash-withdrawal cap as a catalyst for its National Electronic Payments Strategy; electronic money transactions exceeded UGX 366 trillion in 2025, and electronic platforms are exempted from the new ceilings. Uganda's payments regulatory perimeter under the National Payment Systems Act 2020, combined with the new cash-withdrawal-cap regime, signals a structural push toward electronic settlement rails, materially compressing cash-based payout and float models across bank and non-bank PSP channels alike. Taken together, these measures mark a coordinated regulatory tightening of cash-based channels rather than an isolated administrative adjustment. #### Other Developments The National Payment Systems Act 2020 brings payment service providers, electronic money issuers, mobile money operators, aggregators and payment gateways under Bank of Uganda licensing and oversight, closing a prior regulatory vacuum that existed outside the Financial Institutions Act 2004 deposit-taking regime. Mobile money operators in Uganda are licensed as Electronic Money Issuers under the NPS Act 2020, with the National Payment Systems (Agent) Regulations 2021 governing non-exclusive agent appointment. Bank of Uganda maintains a primary Acts and Regulations register confirming its statutory role as licensing and supervisory authority for payments and deposit-taking. Uganda's mobile money market was valued at $920.5 million in 2026 and is projected to reach $2,635.85 million by 2035, a 12.40% compound annual growth rate, with Bank of Uganda restructuring capital-adequacy requirements for operators. A tiered KYC framework is restructuring mobile-money customer onboarding and transaction limits. The mobile money sector counts over 43 million registered accounts processing UGX 326.3 trillion annually, with 2024 transaction value of UGX 253.7 trillion exceeding commercial-bank assets; rising transaction taxes are reported to be pushing usage back toward cash. Mobile money remains the dominant retail-payments rail by transaction value, but rising transaction taxes are reported to be reversing some financial-inclusion gains by pushing usage back toward cash, creating tension with Bank of Uganda's simultaneous cash-restriction policy. Chipper Cash is reported to be navigating cross-border regulatory complexity to extend remittance corridors into East Africa via Uganda's mobile-money rails. Set against Uganda's cold-start baseline, the licensing perimeter, mobile-money market dynamics and correspondent-banking access changes together define the jurisdiction's near-term regulatory trajectory as one of tightening. No instant-payments or interoperability scheme movement (W5) was identified for Uganda this cycle, nor were private-company funding or structural M&A events (W6/W13); AML/CFT Sentinel-fed findings (W11) did not surface this cycle and should be cross-referenced directly with the Financial Integrity Monitor for illicit-finance posture. #### Cross-Monitor Connections Bank of Uganda's cash-withdrawal caps and the NPS Act 2020 licensing perimeter intersect with anti-money-laundering reporting-entity obligations for accountable persons; AML-specific analysis on this intersection is routed to the Financial Integrity Monitor. #### Outlook The cash-withdrawal caps and cheque-threshold reduction take effect 1 January 2027, a quarter-band horizon marker for continued momentum toward Bank of Uganda's National Electronic Payments Strategy. The coming months will show whether the parallel push toward electronic rails and away from cash withdrawal can be reconciled with the tax-driven friction already visible in mobile-money usage. How Ugandan authorities balance inclusion objectives against cash-restriction and tax-policy pressures will be a key marker for the jurisdiction's trajectory through the 2027 effective date. trust tier: ai_unverified ###### Latest update · 11 October 2026 #### Regulatory Status Uganda's payments regulatory architecture remained stable this period under the National Payment Systems Act, 2020 and its 2021 implementing regulations, with Bank of Uganda as sole supervisor; no new or amended licensing, conduct, safeguarding, or mobile-money rule instrument was identified within the search budget available this cycle. The one material development is commercial rather than regulatory: MAM Telecom Ltd, a Uganda-domiciled wallet-based mobile-money entity, secured a USD 250,000 grant from an unnamed private South African individual investor, announced 8 October 2026, with proceeds explicitly earmarked for Bank of Uganda regulatory licensing, platform build-out, and risk and compliance systems ahead of a planned Uganda launch. #### Outlook The principal item to watch for Uganda is whether MAM Telecom's licensing process with Bank of Uganda reaches a disclosed outcome, converting this cycle's commercial-intelligence finding into a tracked market-access development. The absence of any dated Bank of Uganda primary-source publication on licensing, safeguarding, or mobile-money rules this period is logged as a coverage gap rather than a confirmed no-change position, given the available search budget. _2 earlier updates not shown here._ ###### Standing brief · as of 4 August 2026 _Written before the update above. Where they differ, the update is the more recent position._ #### Regulatory Status Uganda's payments sector operates under the National Payment Systems Act 2020, which brings payment service providers, electronic money issuers and mobile money operators under Bank of Uganda licensing and oversight, with the central bank's statutory register confirming this supervisory role. Bank of Uganda has simultaneously introduced OTC cash-withdrawal caps effective 1 January 2027 (UGX 50 million per day individual; UGX 500 million per day corporate) alongside a halving of interbank cheque value thresholds, framed as a catalyst for the National Electronic Payments Strategy under which electronic platforms are exempted from the new ceilings. Mobile money remains the dominant retail rail, with over 43 million registered accounts processing UGX 326.3 trillion annually and a 2024 transaction value of UGX 253.7 trillion exceeding commercial-bank assets, even as rising transaction taxes are reported to be pushing some usage back toward cash. #### Outlook Uganda's regulatory perimeter and cash-restriction policy jointly signal a structural push toward electronic settlement rails that will compress cash-based payout and float models across bank and non-bank channels alike, even as tax-driven friction in mobile-money usage creates a countervailing inclusion risk heading into the 1 January 2027 effective date. 14 of 14 modules Signal Density Selections OR within a group, AND across groups. Press / to search. ### W1a Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access Confirmed confirmed 2026-07-04 Uganda's payments licensing regime is anchored in the National Payment Systems Act, 2020 (NPSA) and the National Payment Systems Regulations, 2021, which vest the Bank of Uganda (BoU) with sole authority to license operators of payment systems, payment service providers (including electronic money issuers) and issuers of payment instruments. Three licence categories exist (PSO, PSP, IPI) with tiered minimum capital, and BoU issued the first Class-A PSP and e-money licences to MTN and Airtel's newly incorporated mobile-money subsidiaries in May 2021. Standing sub-brief · as of 4 August 2026 175 words · last cycle 2026-09-14 #### Payment Services Licensing & Legal Basis The National Payment Systems Act 2020 brings payment service providers, electronic money issuers, mobile money operators, aggregators and payment gateways under Bank of Uganda licensing and oversight, closing a prior regulatory vacuum that existed outside the Financial Institutions Act 2004 deposit-taking regime. Mobile money operators in Uganda are licensed as Electronic Money Issuers under the NPS Act 2020, with the National Payment Systems (Agent) Regulations 2021 governing non-exclusive agent appointment. Bank of Uganda maintains a primary Acts and Regulations register confirming its statutory role as licensing and supervisory authority for payments and deposit-taking. This licensing perimeter draws a clear line between deposit-taking banks supervised under the Financial Institutions Act and the growing population of non-bank payment service providers and electronic money issuers now brought under direct Bank of Uganda oversight for the first time. #### Outlook No further licensing-perimeter changes are expected imminently, but the NPS Act 2020 framework remains the active governing basis against which subsequent Bank of Uganda conduct, safeguarding and product-innovation measures will continue to be assessed. Periodic update · new data 2026-09-28 #### Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access The National Payment Systems Act, Cap 59, designates Bank of Uganda as the licensing, supervisory and enforcement authority for payment service providers, including mobile money operators and payment gateways. This confirmed statutory architecture applies across both bank-PSP and non-bank payment-institution/e-money-institution categories, and it forms the legal basis for the two most significant developments this cycle: the incoming cash-withdrawal caps and the mobile-money agent identity-verification requirement. Effective 1 January 2027, Bank of Uganda will impose over-the-counter cash-withdrawal caps of UGX 50 million per day for individuals and UGX 500 million per day for corporates. This measure is exercised under the Bank's authority pursuant to the Financial Institutions Act, Cap 57, and the National Payment Systems Act, Cap 59. The caps are currently sourced only at a lower evidentiary tier this cycle, pending independent retrieval of the underlying Bank of Uganda circular text, and should be treated as confirmed in direction but awaiting stronger primary-source corroboration on precise mechanics and any applicable exemptions. Separately, the National Payment Systems (Agents) Regulations, 2021, a confirmed Tier 1 instrument directly retrieved from the Bank of Uganda's own regulatory publications, governs mobile money agent conduct including identity-verification thresholds, providing the regulatory-instrument backbone for the agent-level ID-verification requirement addressed under Consumer Protection & APP Fraud. #### Outlook The implementation of the 2027 cash-withdrawal caps is the primary licensing and market-access development to track going forward. Independent retrieval of the underlying Bank of Uganda circular would materially strengthen confidence in the precise cap mechanics, any sectoral exemptions, and the treatment of agent-network cash operations, which interact directly with the licensing perimeter this module tracks. **1 earlier distinct update(s)** Periodic update · new data 2026-09-05 #### Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access The National Payment Systems Act, Cap 59 designates the Bank of Uganda as the licensing, supervisory and enforcement authority across Uganda's digital payments landscape, with jurisdiction covering both payment service providers and e-money issuers. This standing authority structure is unchanged this cycle, but BoU has signalled it intends to turn that authority inward on its own governing framework: the Deputy Governor's February 2026 remarks confirmed BoU is conducting an end-of-term evaluation of the National E-Payments Strategy 2021-2026 and is simultaneously developing a Second National E-Payments Strategy covering 2026-2031, with a stated priority within that successor strategy to review the NPS Act regulatory framework itself. This is a materially different signal than routine guidance-level adjustment. A strategy-level commitment to review the primary licensing statute suggests BoU sees the current framework as potentially insufficient for the scale and pace of market growth it is now supervising, rather than merely in need of updated implementing regulations. For payment service providers and e-money issuers operating under the current NPS Act licensing regime, this represents a live watch item: the substance of any resulting framework change is not yet specified, but the direction of travel — a fundamental review rather than incremental guidance — has been stated as a strategic priority. The bank-PSP versus non-bank PI/EMI distinction is relevant context for how any resulting framework change might land: a review of the NPS Act's core licensing architecture would need to address how obligations differ between bank-affiliated payment service providers and non-bank payment institutions and e-money issuers, a distinction inherent to the existing licensing categories the Act already recognises. #### Outlook The near-term signal to watch is the publication timeline and content of BoU's Second National E-Payments Strategy (2026-2031), expected around the fourth quarter of 2026. Whether the stated NPS Act review priority translates into a concrete legislative amendment process, or remains a strategic aspiration within the strategy document, will determine whether this becomes a binding market-access change or remains a watch-list item for a future cycle. **Sources and findings (6)** 1. T1 [https://ulii.org/akn/ug/act/2020/15/eng@2020-09-04/source](https://ulii.org/akn/ug/act/2020/15/eng@2020-09-04/source) 2. T3 [https://aln.africa/insight/the-regulatory-framework-for-fintechs/](https://aln.africa/insight/the-regulatory-framework-for-fintechs/) 3. T3 [https://www.theworldlawgroup.com/membership/news/key-features-of-ugandas-national-payment-systems-act](https://www.theworldlawgroup.com/membership/news/key-features-of-ugandas-national-payment-systems-act) 4. T3 [https://www.tadvocates.com/blog-single.php?id=28](https://www.tadvocates.com/blog-single.php?id=28) 5. T3 [https://www.kaa.co.ug/an-overview-of-the-national-payment-systems-act-2020/](https://www.kaa.co.ug/an-overview-of-the-national-payment-systems-act-2020/) 6. T3 [https://cepiluganda.org/cepil-legal-briefs/the-national-payment-systems-act-2020/](https://cepiluganda.org/cepil-legal-briefs/the-national-payment-systems-act-2020/) ### W1b Conduct, Safeguarding & Promotions Confirmed confirmed 2026-07-04 Safeguarding under the NPSA operates via a 100%-backed trust/special account model: e-money issuers must hold customer funds one-for-one in liquid assets in a trust account (non-bank issuers) or special account (financial institutions), supervised by BoU. The National Payment Systems (Consumer Protection) Regulations, 2022 and the National Payment Systems (Agents) Regulations, 2021 layer conduct and agent-oversight obligations on top of the safeguarding regime. Standing sub-brief · as of 4 July 2026 121 words · last cycle 2026-07-04 #### Conduct, Safeguarding & Promotions E-money issuers in Uganda must hold 100% of issued electronic money in a trust account, if non-bank, or a special account, if a licensed financial institution, in unencumbered liquid assets that are withdrawable on demand. Conduct is governed by the National Payment Systems (Consumer Protection) Regulations, 2022, gazetted 9 September 2022, which Bank of Uganda is reported to be actively enforcing alongside a developing market-conduct supervision framework. #### Outlook Safeguarding remains the standing conduct anchor; with the 100% trust/special-account rule and active Consumer Protection Regulations enforcement both in place, the near-term W1b watch item is whether enforcement actions become publicly reported on a case-by-case basis, and whether the safeguarding rule is extended as new non-bank instrument categories emerge. no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief ** Sources and findings (6)** 1. T1 [https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/act/2020/15/eng@2020-09-04](https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/act/2020/15/eng@2020-09-04) 2. T1 [https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/act/2020/15/eng@2020-09-04](https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/act/2020/15/eng@2020-09-04) 3. T1 [https://ulii.org/akn/ug/act/si/2022/103/eng@2022-09-09](https://ulii.org/akn/ug/act/si/2022/103/eng@2022-09-09) 4. T3 [https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-ugandas-vital-payments-switch-stuck-in-limbo-amid-lobbying-claims-and-competing-business-interests/](https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-ugandas-vital-payments-switch-stuck-in-limbo-amid-lobbying-claims-and-competing-business-interests/) 5. T3 [https://chambers.com/content/item/3266](https://chambers.com/content/item/3266) 6. T3 [https://cepiluganda.org/cepil-legal-briefs/the-national-payment-systems-act-2020/](https://cepiluganda.org/cepil-legal-briefs/the-national-payment-systems-act-2020/) ### W2 Stablecoins & Digital Money Probable confirmed 2026-07-04 Uganda has no licensed stablecoin regime and treats crypto-assets as illegal payment instruments following a 2022 BoU circular and a confirmatory 2023 High Court ruling; the central bank is instead advancing a permissioned-blockchain CBDC ('digital shilling') pilot launched October 2025 in partnership with private blockchain firms, still pre-live and tied to a broader tokenisation initiative. FIA data show a large unregulated 'shadow' virtual-asset market persisting despite the ban. Standing sub-brief · as of 4 July 2026 143 words · last cycle 2026-07-04 #### Stablecoins & Digital Money Bank of Uganda's April 2022 circular barring all NPSA licensees from crypto-currency transactions was upheld by the High Court on 24 April 2023, Justice Ssekaana ruling that cryptocurrency is not an accepted general payment instrument under the current NPS regime. A vendor-led narrative complicates this settled position: Global Settlement Network and Diacente Group announced in October 2025 a partnership piloting a permissioned-blockchain 'digital shilling' CBDC tied to a $5.5bn tokenisation initiative, and Bank of Uganda published a CBDC-consultant application form in March 2026, but no Tier-1 Bank of Uganda announcement confirms a formal pilot launch. #### Outlook The crypto prohibition is settled law absent a legislative reversal; the open question is whether the GSN/Diacente CBDC narrative converts into a confirmed, Tier-1-sourced Bank of Uganda pilot, which would represent the first sanctioned digital-money instrument to sit alongside the standing crypto ban. no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief ** Sources and findings (5)** 1. T3 [https://cbdctracker.hrf.org/currency/uganda](https://cbdctracker.hrf.org/currency/uganda) 2. T3 [https://cbdctracker.hrf.org/currency/uganda](https://cbdctracker.hrf.org/currency/uganda) 3. T3 [https://businesstimesug.com/high-court-upholds-bous-crypto-transactions-ban/](https://businesstimesug.com/high-court-upholds-bous-crypto-transactions-ban/) 4. T3 [https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/business/markets/how-govt-s-crypto-ban-created-a-shs4-trillion-illegal-market-5467028](https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/business/markets/how-govt-s-crypto-ban-created-a-shs4-trillion-illegal-market-5467028) 5. T4 [https://bsvblockchain.org/bsv-blockchain-introduces-its-pilot-program-series-the-ugandan-shilling-stablecoin-project/](https://bsvblockchain.org/bsv-blockchain-introduces-its-pilot-program-series-the-ugandan-shilling-stablecoin-project/) ### W3 Operational Resilience & Critical Infrastructure Confirmed confirmed 2026-07-04 BoU issued mandatory Cyber and Technology Risk Management Guidelines for all supervised financial institutions effective 1 December 2024, layered on the NPSA's 24-hour fraud/breach notification obligation for payment providers. The Computer Misuse (Amendment) Act, 2022 and a new UCC digital forensics lab strengthen the wider incident-response ecosystem. Kept on Dataprotection.gi, not restated here: data and cloud switching obligations on service providers, including notice periods and charges. [Open this jurisdiction's page on Dataprotection.gi →](https://dataprotection.gi/jurisdictions/uganda/) Standing sub-brief · as of 4 July 2026 113 words · last cycle 2026-07-04 #### Operational Resilience & Critical Infrastructure Bank of Uganda's Cyber and Technology Risk Management Guidelines became mandatory for all supervised financial institutions effective 1 December 2024, layered on the National Payment Systems Act's existing 24-hour fraud and breach notification duty. That framework faced its sharpest test in January 2026, when MTN and Airtel mobile-money platforms were fully inoperative for about a week during a government-enforced digital blackout ahead of the 15 January general elections, before service resumed. #### Outlook Having weathered a state-directed shutdown rather than a conventional cyber incident, Bank of Uganda's resilience framework faces a broader test: whether guidance is extended to cover telecom-dependency risk specifically, not solely cyber and technology failure modes. no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief ** Sources and findings (5)** 1. T3 [https://www.pwc.com/ug/en/publications/key-reflections-bou-cyber-risk-management-guidelines.html](https://www.pwc.com/ug/en/publications/key-reflections-bou-cyber-risk-management-guidelines.html) 2. T4 [https://observer.ug/viewpoint/ugandas-financial-sector-must-rethink-cybersecurity-in-2026/](https://observer.ug/viewpoint/ugandas-financial-sector-must-rethink-cybersecurity-in-2026/) 3. T4 [https://observer.ug/viewpoint/ugandas-financial-sector-must-rethink-cybersecurity-in-2026/](https://observer.ug/viewpoint/ugandas-financial-sector-must-rethink-cybersecurity-in-2026/) 4. T3 [https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/news/national/mobile-money-scam-victim-lifts-lid-on-con-3993870](https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/news/national/mobile-money-scam-victim-lifts-lid-on-con-3993870) 5. T3 [https://techmoran.com/2026/01/22/ugandas-mtn-and-airtel-restore-mobile-money-after-election-shutdown/](https://techmoran.com/2026/01/22/ugandas-mtn-and-airtel-restore-mobile-money-after-election-shutdown/) ### W4 Scheme & Network Compliance Probable confirmed 2026-07-04 Card-scheme compliance in Uganda runs through international rulebooks (Visa/Mastercard, PCI DSS) applied via local acquiring banks, while mobile money remains the dominant proprietary rail (MTN attained GSMA Mobile Money Certification). A long-delayed Bank of Uganda National Payments Switch procurement — intended to give the country its own interoperable domestic scheme — remains stalled after tender cancellation, leaving merchant-facing scheme infrastructure fragmented. Standing sub-brief · as of 4 July 2026 127 words · last cycle 2026-07-04 #### Scheme & Network Compliance MTN Uganda has attained GSMA Mobile Money Certification, an independent scheme-level assessment of secure and reliable service delivery, consumer-rights protection, and AML/CFT capability — distinct from card-scheme rulebooks such as Visa, Mastercard or PCI-DSS. Scheme-level infrastructure for domestic switching remains unresolved: Bank of Uganda's National Payments Switch tender, launched July 2023 with more than twenty bidders, reached final evaluation with Paylogic S.A. reportedly the preferred bidder, before the process was unexpectedly cancelled amid lobbying claims and competing business interests, leaving domestic scheme infrastructure fragmented. #### Outlook Whether Bank of Uganda revives, re-tenders, or abandons the National Payments Switch procurement will determine if Uganda's scheme layer consolidates around a domestic switch or continues to rely on card-scheme and mobile-money-scheme certification as parallel, fragmented compliance tracks. no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief ** Sources and findings (4)** 1. T3 [https://www.cgap.org/blog/how-are-mobile-money-agents-protecting-customers-data-in-uganda](https://www.cgap.org/blog/how-are-mobile-money-agents-protecting-customers-data-in-uganda) 2. T4 [https://payatlas.com/countries/uganda-ug](https://payatlas.com/countries/uganda-ug) 3. T3 [https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-ugandas-vital-payments-switch-stuck-in-limbo-amid-lobbying-claims-and-competing-business-interests/](https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-ugandas-vital-payments-switch-stuck-in-limbo-amid-lobbying-claims-and-competing-business-interests/) 4. T3 [https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-ugandas-vital-payments-switch-stuck-in-limbo-amid-lobbying-claims-and-competing-business-interests/](https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-ugandas-vital-payments-switch-stuck-in-limbo-amid-lobbying-claims-and-competing-business-interests/) ### W5 Payment Corridor Dynamics Probable confirmed 2026-07-04 Uganda's cross-border rails run principally through the RTGS-integrated East African Payment System (EAPS, EAC currencies) and the COMESA Regional Payment and Settlement System (REPSS, settled in USD/EUR), alongside conventional SWIFT correspondent channels. Uganda is not yet confirmed as a directly connected PAPSS member state in available sourcing (absent-field). The January 2026 telecoms shutdown drove a visible informal corridor of Ugandans routing mobile money through Kenyan wallets, illustrating both inclusion-rail dependence and corridor fragility. Standing sub-brief · as of 4 July 2026 112 words · last cycle 2026-09-14 #### Payment Corridor Dynamics Uganda's cross-border settlement runs through RTGS-integrated channels: the East African Payment System (EAPS) for EAC-currency transfers, and COMESA's REPSS, which settles in USD/EUR, alongside conventional SWIFT correspondent-banking channels. During the January 2026 telecom blackout, Ugandans routed MTN and Airtel mobile-money funds through Kenyan M-Pesa and Airtel Money wallets, converting Kenyan shillings back into Ugandan currency to ease domestic cash shortages, opening a fragile informal cross-border corridor. #### Outlook The informal UG-KE corridor that opened during the blackout is expected to close as domestic mobile money normalises, but it has demonstrated a fragile dependency that regional-rail resilience planning (EAPS/REPSS) does not yet address; PAPSS connectivity status remains an open sourcing gap. Periodic update · new data 2026-09-28 #### Payment Corridor Dynamics Uganda's domestic payment infrastructure showed material growth this cycle. The interbank settlement system grew in value by 15.1 percent year-on-year, from UGX 891.3 trillion in 2024 to UGX 1,025.7 trillion in 2025, according to public remarks by Bank of Uganda's Deputy Governor. This growth rate is a meaningful indicator of the increasing centrality of formal settlement rails within Uganda's broader payment ecosystem. Bank of Uganda's Deputy Governor has publicly called for a faster shift toward secure digital payments, characterising mobile money as systemically important infrastructure in the process. This characterisation, delivered directly by a senior central-bank official, signals that mobile money's role is being explicitly elevated in Uganda's payments-policy thinking, beyond its historical treatment as a peripheral or supplementary payment channel. The settlement-value growth and the systemic-importance characterisation together form a coherent corridor-dynamics narrative this cycle: formal digital settlement volume is expanding, and the central bank is actively working to reinforce that expansion through complementary measures, including the cash-withdrawal caps addressed under Licensing, Authorisation & Market Access and the identity-verification tightening addressed under Consumer Protection & APP Fraud. #### Outlook The key marker for coming cycles is whether interbank settlement value growth continues at a comparable pace once the 2027 cash-withdrawal caps take effect and begin pushing additional transaction volume from cash into formal digital rails. A sustained or accelerated growth rate would corroborate the formalisation thesis underlying this cycle's regulatory measures. **Sources and findings (5)** 1. T1 [https://www.bou.or.ug/bouwebsite/PaymentSystems/rtgs.html](https://www.bou.or.ug/bouwebsite/PaymentSystems/rtgs.html) 2. T1 [https://www.bou.or.ug/bouwebsite/PaymentSystems/systems.html](https://www.bou.or.ug/bouwebsite/PaymentSystems/systems.html) 3. T3 [https://www.fintechfutures.com/instant-real-time-payments/bank-of-uganda-upgrades-rtgs-with-sweden-s-cma](https://www.fintechfutures.com/instant-real-time-payments/bank-of-uganda-upgrades-rtgs-with-sweden-s-cma) 4. T3 [https://kenyanwallstreet.com/ugandans-rely-on-kenyan-mobile-wallets](https://kenyanwallstreet.com/ugandans-rely-on-kenyan-mobile-wallets) 5. T2 [https://migrantmoney.uncdf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Uganda-Infrastructure-Assessment-Report_April2025.pdf](https://migrantmoney.uncdf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Uganda-Infrastructure-Assessment-Report_April2025.pdf) ### W6 Industry Structure & Commercial Probable confirmed 2026-07-04 Uganda's banking sector is concentrated (top-10 banks ~81% of assets, Stanbic the market leader) while the payments layer is fragmented across 170+ private players spanning MNO-led mobile money, banks, fintechs and aggregators. Agent banking, run through the shared Agent Banking Company platform (22,000+ agents), now facilitates the large majority of cash-in/cash-out activity, and the stalled National Payments Switch procurement remains the central unresolved industry-structure question. Standing sub-brief · as of 4 July 2026 107 words · last cycle 2026-07-04 #### Industry Structure & Commercial Dynamics Uganda's banking sector is highly concentrated: the top ten banks control roughly 81% of industry assets, with Stanbic Bank the largest at UGX 10.34 trillion in 2024, approximately 19.52% of the industry total. That bank-centred concentration coexists with a fragmented, agent-driven distribution layer: the Agent Banking Company's shared platform supports more than 22,000 agents across banks, MDIs, MFIs, SACCOs and fintechs, now facilitating the large majority of cash-in/cash-out activity nationally. #### Outlook Industry structure is likely to remain bifurcated — concentrated banking, fragmented payments — absent resolution of the National Payments Switch question; agent-banking's dominance of cash-in/cash-out activity is expected to deepen further. no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief ** Sources and findings (5)** 1. T4 [https://nairobionline.com/directory/top-10-banks-in-uganda-by-market-share/](https://nairobionline.com/directory/top-10-banks-in-uganda-by-market-share/) 2. T3 [https://www.independent.co.ug/national-payment-systems-act-will-new-regulations-deliver-growth-in-fintech-sector/](https://www.independent.co.ug/national-payment-systems-act-will-new-regulations-deliver-growth-in-fintech-sector/) 3. T3 [https://eagle.co.ug/2021/10/20/national-payment-systems-act-will-new-regulations-deliver-growth-in-the-fintech-sector/](https://eagle.co.ug/2021/10/20/national-payment-systems-act-will-new-regulations-deliver-growth-in-the-fintech-sector/) 4. T4 [https://agentbanking.co.ug/](https://agentbanking.co.ug/) 5. T3 [https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-ugandas-vital-payments-switch-stuck-in-limbo-amid-lobbying-claims-and-competing-business-interests/](https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-ugandas-vital-payments-switch-stuck-in-limbo-amid-lobbying-claims-and-competing-business-interests/) ### W7 Legal & Litigation Confirmed confirmed 2026-07-04 Ugandan courts have shaped the payments regime through a landmark 2023 High Court ruling upholding BoU's 2022 crypto-transaction ban as a legitimate exercise of NPSA authority, and a growing body of digital-fraud liability case law (Gabigogo, Egesa, Atiku, Abacus Parenteral) that applies a UK-style Quincecare-duty framework while frequently splitting liability between banks and customers. A 2026 judicial review against the Financial Intelligence Authority over an unexplained account freeze also tests the limits of AML enforcement powers. Standing sub-brief · as of 4 July 2026 147 words · last cycle 2026-07-04 #### Legal & Litigation Justice Musa Ssekaana of the High Court ruled on 24 April 2023 that cryptocurrencies under the current NPS regime are illegal, unlawful and not accepted as a general payment instrument, dismissing the challenge to Bank of Uganda's crypto-transaction circular. In Abacus Parenteral v Stanbic Bank, the High Court split liability for a fraudulent-transaction loss, holding the bank 20% liable given inadequate fraud-detection systems and beneficiary-verification failures, with the customer bearing the remainder. Separately, BMS General Trading filed a 2026 judicial review challenging the Financial Intelligence Authority's October 2025 directive freezing its bank account on money-laundering suspicion, for lack of a reasonable basis or a hearing, testing the limits of the Authority's enforcement powers. #### Outlook Litigation activity is expected to continue across three tracks: crypto-ban enforcement (settled), digital-fraud liability allocation between banks and customers (developing), and the limits of FIA's account-freezing powers (pending judicial review). no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief ** Sources and findings (5)** 1. T3 [https://kandk.co.ug/court-dismisses-cryptocurrencies-case/](https://kandk.co.ug/court-dismisses-cryptocurrencies-case/) 2. T3 [https://www.afriwise.com/blog/uganda-who-pays-for-digital-fraud-in-banking-courts-draw-the-line](https://www.afriwise.com/blog/uganda-who-pays-for-digital-fraud-in-banking-courts-draw-the-line) 3. T3 [https://www.afriwise.com/blog/uganda-who-pays-for-digital-fraud-in-banking-courts-draw-the-line](https://www.afriwise.com/blog/uganda-who-pays-for-digital-fraud-in-banking-courts-draw-the-line) 4. T3 [https://www.mmaks.co.ug/articles/2026/04/13/uganda-high-court-clarifies-limits-financial-intelligence-authoritys-account](https://www.mmaks.co.ug/articles/2026/04/13/uganda-high-court-clarifies-limits-financial-intelligence-authoritys-account) 5. T3 [https://www.tadvocates.com/blog-single.php?id=28](https://www.tadvocates.com/blog-single.php?id=28) ### W8 Merchant Acquiring & Risk Probable confirmed 2026-07-04 Merchant acquiring in Uganda is split between traditional bank acquirers (operating standard chargeback/dispute contracts) and a growing agent/aggregator layer regulated under the Financial Institutions (Agent Banking) Regulations, 2017. High-risk verticals such as gaming and crypto face restricted local acquiring options, pushing them toward offshore facilitators, while fragmented merchant acceptance infrastructure (multiple QR/settlement standards) remains a structural drag that BoU is attempting to resolve via standardisation efforts tied to the delayed National Payments Switch. Standing sub-brief · as of 4 July 2026 94 words · last cycle 2026-07-04 #### Merchant Acquiring & Risk High-risk merchants — gaming, crypto and adult content — face limited local acquiring options given regulatory scrutiny and PSP risk policies, typically necessitating offshore payment facilitators. Standard Ugandan bank merchant agreements, such as Stanbic Bank's, permit acquirer payments to be reversed post-settlement if subject to a chargeback or claim, even after goods or services have already been provided. #### Outlook Merchant acquiring is expected to remain constrained for high-risk verticals absent a change to the crypto prohibition or a dedicated high-risk-merchant licensing track; standard chargeback terms are unlikely to change materially. no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief ** Sources and findings (5)** 1. T3 [https://chambers.com/content/item/3266](https://chambers.com/content/item/3266) 2. T4 [https://payatlas.com/countries/uganda-ug](https://payatlas.com/countries/uganda-ug) 3. T2 [https://www.stanbicbank.co.ug/static_file/Uganda/Downloadable%20files/Application%20docs/Merchant%20Agreement%20Contract%20-%20Uganda%20FINAL%20v.6.v6.pdf](https://www.stanbicbank.co.ug/static_file/Uganda/Downloadable%20files/Application%20docs/Merchant%20Agreement%20Contract%20-%20Uganda%20FINAL%20v.6.v6.pdf) 4. T3 [https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-ugandas-vital-payments-switch-stuck-in-limbo-amid-lobbying-claims-and-competing-business-interests/](https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-ugandas-vital-payments-switch-stuck-in-limbo-amid-lobbying-claims-and-competing-business-interests/) 5. T4 [https://www.rukapay.co.ug/merchants](https://www.rukapay.co.ug/merchants) ### W9 Product Innovation & Market Development limited signal Probable confirmed 2026-07-04 Product innovation is concentrated around three fronts: BoU's CBDC pilot and tokenisation drive, the NPSA regulatory sandbox (already used by at least one approved fintech), and a fresh Capital Markets Authority fintech sandbox launched in October 2025. BoU is simultaneously pushing a 'cash-lite' agenda — cutting cheque/cash limits and expanding ACH/RTGS capacity — to force migration onto digital rails. Horizon · 2027-01-01 (±quarter) New interbank cheque limits and OTC cash withdrawal caps in force_adopted · TT3_ Horizon · 2027-01-01 (±quarter) Interbank cheque-value cuts & OTC cash-withdrawal caps enter into force_in_force_pending · TT3_ Horizon · 2027-01-01 (±quarter) New interbank cheque limits and OTC cash withdrawal caps in force_adopted · TT3_ Standing sub-brief · as of 4 August 2026 192 words · last cycle 2026-09-14 #### Product Innovation & Market Development Uganda's mobile money market was valued at $920.5 million in 2026 and is projected to reach $2,635.85 million by 2035, a 12.40% compound annual growth rate, with Bank of Uganda restructuring capital-adequacy requirements for operators. A tiered KYC framework is restructuring mobile-money customer onboarding and transaction limits. The mobile money sector counts over 43 million registered accounts processing UGX 326.3 trillion annually, with 2024 transaction value of UGX 253.7 trillion exceeding commercial-bank assets; rising transaction taxes are reported to be pushing usage back toward cash. Mobile money remains the dominant retail-payments rail by transaction value, but rising transaction taxes are reported to be reversing some financial-inclusion gains by pushing usage back toward cash, creating tension with Bank of Uganda's simultaneous cash-restriction policy. Chipper Cash is reported to be navigating cross-border regulatory complexity to extend remittance corridors into East Africa via Uganda's mobile-money rails. #### Outlook The trajectory for Uganda's mobile-money market is one of continued volume growth alongside a live tension between tax policy and financial-inclusion objectives; how Bank of Uganda's tiered KYC framework and capital-adequacy restructuring interact with usage patterns will be a key signal to track. Periodic update · new data 2026-09-28 #### Product Innovation & Market Development Bank of Uganda's central bank digital currency initiative has moved from a preliminary study phase into an experimental phase. The central bank published an application form for CBDC consultants in March 2026, and reporting indicates a pilot has been deployed on a permissioned blockchain backed by treasury bonds. This represents a notable escalation in the concreteness of Uganda's CBDC work relative to prior, more exploratory positioning. The specific technical architecture described, a permissioned blockchain with treasury-bond backing, is sourced at a lower evidentiary tier this cycle and should be treated with appropriate caution pending stronger corroboration directly from Bank of Uganda. Nonetheless, the consultant-application-form publication itself indicates a concrete institutional commitment of resources to the CBDC programme, moving beyond purely conceptual study. This development sits alongside, but is analytically distinct from, the private stablecoin question tracked by the crypto monitor: Uganda's CBDC work is a sovereign digital-currency initiative undertaken directly by the central bank, not a framework for authorising privately issued digital-money instruments. #### Outlook The central marker to watch is whether Bank of Uganda progresses from the current experimental/pilot phase toward a public rollout decision or an extended pilot programme, and whether independent, primary-source confirmation of the specific technical architecture becomes available. The consultant-recruitment activity suggests continued institutional momentum behind the programme. **1 earlier distinct update(s)** Periodic update · new data 2026-09-05 #### Product Innovation & Market Development Mobile money remains the dominant rail in Uganda's digital payments market, and this cycle's data confirms it is growing at a substantial pace: electronic money transaction values rose 28 percent year-on-year to December 2025, from Shs 285.9 trillion to Shs 366 trillion, while transaction volumes rose 17.3 percent, from 7.8 billion to 9.1 billion transactions over the same period. This growth trajectory underscores why the Bank of Uganda has prioritised a fundamental review of its payments regulatory framework rather than incremental adjustment — the market has scaled well beyond the parameters likely anticipated when the current National E-Payments Strategy was drafted in 2021. Alongside this organic growth in the established mobile-money rail, BoU is pursuing two forward-looking product-development strands in parallel: a central bank digital currency feasibility study, and development of a virtual-asset regulatory framework. Both remain at the study and framework-development stage rather than having produced a live product or binding rule this cycle. The CBDC feasibility work and the virtual-asset framework development appear to be treated by BoU as complementary components of the same digital-money modernisation agenda, running alongside the broader NPS Act review rather than as isolated initiatives. The overlap between the virtual-asset framework and the crypto monitor's stablecoin and digital-money coverage is noted but not analysed further here; this sub-brief's ownership is limited to the product-innovation and market-development signal that BoU is actively pursuing these workstreams, not the substantive regulatory content of the eventual virtual-asset framework itself. #### Outlook The electronic-money growth trend is likely to continue absent a material regulatory intervention, and the key signal to watch is whether the CBDC feasibility study or the virtual-asset framework produces a public consultation document or draft instrument in the coming cycles, which would elevate either workstream from an internal study to an active regulatory development. **Sources and findings (5)** 1. T3 [https://springsadvocates.com/an-overview-of-the-national-payment-systems-act-2020-and-all-regulations-thereunder/](https://springsadvocates.com/an-overview-of-the-national-payment-systems-act-2020-and-all-regulations-thereunder/) 2. T3 [https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/business/finance/uganda-opens-sandbox-to-attract-fintech-founders--5436826](https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/business/finance/uganda-opens-sandbox-to-attract-fintech-founders--5436826) 3. T3 [https://www.fintechfutures.com/instant-real-time-payments/bank-of-uganda-upgrades-rtgs-with-sweden-s-cma](https://www.fintechfutures.com/instant-real-time-payments/bank-of-uganda-upgrades-rtgs-with-sweden-s-cma) 4. T3 [https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-uganda-introduces-new-cheque-and-cash-withdrawal-limits-directs-banks-to-shift-to-digital-transactions/](https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-uganda-introduces-new-cheque-and-cash-withdrawal-limits-directs-banks-to-shift-to-digital-transactions/) 5. T4 [https://thepaypers.com/crypto-web3-and-cbdc/news/uganda-unveils-usd-55-bln-tokenised-economy-initiative](https://thepaypers.com/crypto-web3-and-cbdc/news/uganda-unveils-usd-55-bln-tokenised-economy-initiative) ### W10 Consumer Protection & APP Fraud Confirmed confirmed 2026-07-04 The National Payment Systems (Consumer Protection) Regulations, 2022 anchor formal consumer protection, reinforced by an April 2024 BoU directive mandating national-ID verification for mobile-money transactions of UGX 1 million or more and a 24-hour fraud/breach reporting obligation on providers. Mobile money fraud (SIM-swap, social-engineering, insider collusion) remains a persistent, high-profile risk, with case law increasingly allocating loss between banks and customers rather than imposing strict provider liability. Standing sub-brief · as of 4 July 2026 109 words · last cycle 2026-09-14 #### Consumer Protection & APP Fraud Bank of Uganda's April 2024 directive requires national-ID, passport, refugee or alien-ID verification for mobile-money transactions of UGX 1 million or more conducted at agent locations, citing rising fraud and scam usage of mobile-money platforms. The persistent fraud risk was illustrated by a significant SIM-swap-enabled mobile-money fraud incident resulting in an estimated $3.2 million loss, using approximately 2,000 SIM cards to infiltrate the payment system and instruct transfers dispersed across those cards. #### Outlook Consumer-protection tightening is likely to continue via threshold-based ID verification and enforcement of the 2022 Consumer Protection Regulations, though SIM-swap and insider-collusion fraud typologies remain a persistent, only partially addressed risk. Periodic update · new data 2026-09-28 #### Consumer Protection & APP Fraud Bank of Uganda now requires mobile money agents to verify customer identification, accepting national ID, passport, refugee ID, or alien ID, for transactions of UGX 1 million or more. The regulator has explicitly cited rising fraud and scams as the basis for this measure. This requirement is grounded in section 55(1)(b) of the National Payment Systems Act and regulation 7(h) of the National Payment Systems (Agents) Regulations, 2021, giving it a confirmed statutory and regulatory basis directly retrieved from Bank of Uganda's own published regulatory materials. This is a direct consumer-protection and anti-fraud control targeted specifically at the agent-facilitated transaction layer of Uganda's mobile money ecosystem, the primary channel through which most Ugandan consumers interact with the formal payment system. By requiring identity verification above a defined transaction threshold, the measure is designed to create a documented audit trail for higher-value mobile money transactions, directly responsive to reported fraud and scam patterns in that channel. This measure should be read alongside the broader formalisation push evident in the incoming 2027 cash-withdrawal caps: both measures work in the same direction, increasing the traceability and identity-verification rigor applied to higher-value transactions as they move through formal payment channels, whether via agent-facilitated mobile money or bank-channel cash withdrawal. #### Outlook The key development to watch is whether the UGX 1 million identity-verification threshold produces a measurable reduction in reported mobile money fraud and scam incidents, which would validate the regulator's stated rationale for the measure. Any further tightening of the threshold, or extension of similar identity-verification requirements to other transaction types, would be a significant development for the coming cycle. **1 earlier distinct update(s)** Periodic update · new data 2026-09-05 #### Consumer Protection & APP Fraud Uganda's consumer-protection framework for digital payments rests on the 2022 update to the National Payment Systems Regulations, which introduced dedicated Consumer Protection Regulations applicable to all institutions licensed under the NPS Act. This standing framework is unchanged this cycle, but the Bank of Uganda has layered new initiatives on top of it as part of its broader 2026 strategic priorities: an anti-fraud initiative organised under a Financial Sector Anti-Fraud Consortium, and a Second Financial Literacy Strategy covering 2026-2031. The anti-fraud consortium structure suggests a cross-institutional response to fraud risk rather than a purely regulatory or purely industry-led approach, positioning BoU as a convening authority alongside financial-sector participants. The financial literacy strategy, as a successor to an evidently concluding first strategy, indicates continuity of BoU's consumer-education efforts rather than a new policy direction, though the specific content and targets of the second strategy have not yet been detailed in sources available this cycle. Both initiatives should be read against the backdrop of the strong transaction growth documented in the payments-market data this cycle: rising transaction volumes and values in the mobile-money-dominated market increase the surface area for consumer-facing fraud, giving practical urgency to both the anti-fraud consortium and the literacy strategy even though neither has yet produced a specific rule, threshold, or reporting obligation this cycle. #### Outlook The key items to watch are the formal launch and membership structure of the Financial Sector Anti-Fraud Consortium, and whether the Second Financial Literacy Strategy (2026-2031) is published with specific consumer-protection metrics or targets. Neither initiative currently carries a binding compliance obligation for licensed payment institutions, but that could change if the consortium's work produces a reporting or information-sharing requirement. **Sources and findings (5)** 1. T3 [https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/business/finance/bou-issues-new-rules-for-mobile-money-transactions--4596110](https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/business/finance/bou-issues-new-rules-for-mobile-money-transactions--4596110) 2. T3 [https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/news/national/mobile-money-scam-victim-lifts-lid-on-con-3993870](https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/news/national/mobile-money-scam-victim-lifts-lid-on-con-3993870) 3. T4 [https://www.neuralt.com/news-insights/mobile-money-payment-fraud-on-the-rise](https://www.neuralt.com/news-insights/mobile-money-payment-fraud-on-the-rise) 4. T3 [https://www.afriwise.com/blog/uganda-who-pays-for-digital-fraud-in-banking-courts-draw-the-line](https://www.afriwise.com/blog/uganda-who-pays-for-digital-fraud-in-banking-courts-draw-the-line) 5. T3 [https://www.cgap.org/blog/fraud-in-uganda-how-millions-were-lost-to-internal-collusion](https://www.cgap.org/blog/fraud-in-uganda-how-millions-were-lost-to-internal-collusion) ### W11 AML/CFT & Financial Crime (Sentinel.gi-fed) [Sourced from Sentinel.gi ↗](https://sentinel.gi/jurisdictions/uganda/#sec-dom-D7) Probable confirmed 2026-07-04 sentinel.position: Uganda is assessed by ESAAMLG under the FATF framework and has a documented history of FATF grey-list membership tied to its 2016 mutual evaluation, with the Financial Intelligence Authority as the domestic financial-intelligence unit. A September 2025 FIA virtual-asset risk assessment quantifies substantial unregulated crypto flows as a residual ML/TF exposure, and 2026 case law shows FIA account-freezing powers being actively tested in court. This module carries the Sentinel.gi payments-context position only; no original illicit-finance analysis is performed here. Standing sub-brief · as of 4 July 2026 114 words · last cycle 2026-07-04 #### AML/CFT & Financial Crime (Sentinel.gi-fed) sentinel.gi position: Uganda is an ESAAMLG member assessed under the FATF framework, with a documented history of grey-list membership tied to its 2016 mutual evaluation. The Financial Intelligence Authority's inaugural National ML/TF Risk Assessment on Virtual Assets, published September 2025, found $564 million in virtual-asset inflows and $546 million in outflows between July 2020 and June 2024, despite the standing crypto-transaction ban — intelligence this Monitor carries as payments-context only, per Sentinel.gi feed attribution, with illicit-finance analysis routed to the Financial Intelligence Monitor. #### Outlook This module is Sentinel.gi-fed; ongoing monitoring of Uganda's ESAAMLG/FATF standing and FIA enforcement activity should be tracked through the Sentinel feed rather than re-analysed here. no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief ** Sources and findings (6)** 1. T3 sentinel.mmaks.co.ug/articles/2026/04/13/uganda-high-court-clarifies-limits-financial-intelligence-authoritys-account 2. T? FIM (sentinel.gi) per-JID baseline profile — Uganda — Uganda's AML/CFT/CPF regime rests on the Anti-Money Laundering Act 2013 (amended 2017) and AML Regulations 2015, supervised by the Financial Intelligence Authority (FIA) and Bank of Uganda. Uganda exited FATF increased monitoring in February 2024 and the EU high-risk third-country list in June 2025 after ESAAMLG-verified technical-compliance improvements, but structural exposure persists via gold/mineral transit, EACOP oil finance, and PEP corruption networks. 3. T? FIM (sentinel.gi) gaps_register_cumulative (issue FIM-BASE-GAP-004) — Gap: sourcing-thinness 4. T1 FIM (sentinel.gi) sanctions_change_register (issue FIM-BASE-SANC-002) — Sanctions: OFSI divergence 5. T? FIM (sentinel.gi) gaps_register_cumulative (issue FIM-BASE-GAP-003) — Gap: political-constraint 6. T? FIM (sentinel.gi) gaps_register_cumulative (issue FIM-BASE-GAP-001) — Gap: enforcement-absence ### W12 Correspondent Banking, Settlement & Access Probable confirmed 2026-07-04 High-value settlement runs through BoU's RTGS (UNIS/UNISS), open to both banks and non-bank financial institutions, with regional reach via EAPS and COMESA's REPSS (settled in USD/EUR through correspondent-style hard-currency settlement). Foreign-owned banks (Stanbic/Standard Bank Group, Absa, formerly Barclays) remain the principal conduits to global correspondent networks; explicit evidence of correspondent de-risking pressure specific to Uganda was searched for but not found in available sourcing (absent-field). Standing sub-brief · as of 4 August 2026 188 words · last cycle 2026-08-04 #### Correspondent Banking, Settlement & Access Bank of Uganda has imposed new over-the-counter cash-withdrawal caps effective 1 January 2027, setting individual limits at UGX 50 million per day (UGX 250 million per week) and corporate limits at UGX 500 million per day (UGX 2.5 billion per week). Concurrently, interbank cheque value thresholds are being halved, with the local-currency ceiling falling from UGX 10 million to UGX 5 million, running alongside the cash-withdrawal policy. Bank of Uganda has framed the cash-withdrawal cap as a catalyst for its National Electronic Payments Strategy; electronic money transactions exceeded UGX 366 trillion in 2025, and electronic platforms are exempted from the new ceilings. Uganda's payments regulatory perimeter under the National Payment Systems Act 2020, combined with the new cash-withdrawal-cap regime, signals a structural push toward electronic settlement rails, materially compressing cash-based payout and float models across bank and non-bank PSP channels alike. #### Outlook As the 1 January 2027 effective date approaches, the practical test will be whether bank-operated cash infrastructure and non-bank electronic rails absorb the redirected volume smoothly, or whether the cheque-threshold and withdrawal-cap combination creates near-term liquidity friction for corporate treasury operations. no periodic updates on record for this sub-brief ** Sources and findings (5)** 1. T1 [https://archive.bou.or.ug/bou/payment_systems/Uganda_National_Interbank_Settlement_UNIS.html](https://archive.bou.or.ug/bou/payment_systems/Uganda_National_Interbank_Settlement_UNIS.html) 2. T2 [https://migrantmoney.uncdf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Uganda-Infrastructure-Assessment-Report_April2025.pdf](https://migrantmoney.uncdf.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Uganda-Infrastructure-Assessment-Report_April2025.pdf) 3. T1 [https://www.bou.or.ug/bouwebsite/PaymentSystems/systems.html](https://www.bou.or.ug/bouwebsite/PaymentSystems/systems.html) 4. T4 [https://bunyorofinancebank.com/foreign-banks-in-uganda/](https://bunyorofinancebank.com/foreign-banks-in-uganda/) 5. T3 [https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-ugandas-vital-payments-switch-stuck-in-limbo-amid-lobbying-claims-and-competing-business-interests/](https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-ugandas-vital-payments-switch-stuck-in-limbo-amid-lobbying-claims-and-competing-business-interests/) ### W13 Commercial Intelligence (M&A, Investment & Product) Probable confirmed 2026-07-04 The trailing-12-month window (July 2025-July 2026) is dominated by three commercial events: the BoU/CMA Small Systems RTGS modernisation contract, the GSN/Diacente $5.5bn tokenisation and CBDC-pilot partnership, and the stalled/cancelled National Payments Switch procurement — alongside modest but positive fintech equity funding and a new CMA regulatory sandbox for capital-markets fintechs. Standing sub-brief · as of 4 July 2026 197 words · last cycle 2026-10-11 #### Commercial Intelligence (M&A, Investment & Product) Bank of Uganda partnered with Swedish vendor CMA Small Systems to migrate the UNIS RTGS platform to the CMA RTS/X system, a completed product release supporting ISO 20022 messaging, real-time multi-currency settlement, and delivery-versus-payment / payment-versus-payment functionality; contract value was not publicly disclosed. Global Settlement Network and Diacente Group announced, in October 2025, a partnership framed around a Uganda CBDC pilot tied to a broader $5.5 billion tokenisation initiative; the announcement is vendor-sourced and not yet confirmed by any Tier-1 Bank of Uganda publication. The Bank of Uganda National Payments Switch tender was terminated after Paylogic S.A. reportedly emerged as preferred bidder, amid lobbying claims and competing business interests — the same underlying procurement event tracked separately in W4. The Capital Markets Authority separately launched its Fintech Regulatory Sandbox product in October 2025, now holding four active applications — a regulatory-sandbox product launch distinct from the pre-existing Bank of Uganda NPSA sandbox track. #### Outlook The trailing-twelve-month commercial calendar — RTGS modernisation, the vendor-led CBDC announcement, the cancelled Switch tender, and the CMA sandbox launch — will likely be joined by further switch-related developments once Bank of Uganda signals a path forward. Periodic update · new data 2026-10-11 #### Commercial Intelligence & Fintech MAM Telecom Ltd, a Uganda-domiciled payments entity, secured a USD 250,000 grant from an unnamed private South African individual investor, announced 8 October 2026. The capital commitment is explicitly earmarked for Uganda mobile-money float infrastructure build-out and regulatory licensing: MAM Telecom's own stated rationale is that the funds will be spent on regulatory licensing, hiring technical and operations staff, building its platform, and setting up risk and compliance systems ahead of a launch in Uganda. This is a confirmed, disclosed-amount capital-commitment event at an early, announced stage rather than a completed institutional funding round; no closing date, equity terms, or further investor detail beyond the single private individual investor has been disclosed. The event is best classified as a grant or seed-adjacent commitment rather than a venture round, both in dollar size and in its explicit framing around regulatory compliance spend rather than product scaling. MAM Telecom's sector category is wallet-based mobile money, placing it within Uganda's broader mobile-money ecosystem, though no detail on its specific licence class or application status with Bank of Uganda has surfaced within the available evidence this cycle. The stated use of proceeds for licensing costs suggests the entity has not yet completed its Bank of Uganda authorisation process as of the announcement date. #### Outlook The development to watch is whether MAM Telecom's stated regulatory-licensing spend converts into a disclosed Bank of Uganda authorisation outcome, which would move this finding from a commercial-intelligence capital event into a tracked market-access development. No further financing, partnership, or product-launch detail for MAM Telecom has been identified in the evidence available this cycle. **Sources and findings (6)** 1. T3 [https://www.fintechfutures.com/instant-real-time-payments/bank-of-uganda-upgrades-rtgs-with-sweden-s-cma](https://www.fintechfutures.com/instant-real-time-payments/bank-of-uganda-upgrades-rtgs-with-sweden-s-cma) 2. T4 [https://www.mariblock.com/uganda-launches-cbdc-pilot-in-5-5-billion-tokenization-drive/](https://www.mariblock.com/uganda-launches-cbdc-pilot-in-5-5-billion-tokenization-drive/) 3. T3 [https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/business/finance/uganda-opens-sandbox-to-attract-fintech-founders--5436826](https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/business/finance/uganda-opens-sandbox-to-attract-fintech-founders--5436826) 4. T4 [https://tracxn.com/d/geographies/uganda/aRcH8lYOC74CSa9mr7vgyHhBJWaueYmL8hEEt4Fw9U4](https://tracxn.com/d/geographies/uganda/aRcH8lYOC74CSa9mr7vgyHhBJWaueYmL8hEEt4Fw9U4) 5. T3 [https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-ugandas-vital-payments-switch-stuck-in-limbo-amid-lobbying-claims-and-competing-business-interests/](https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-ugandas-vital-payments-switch-stuck-in-limbo-amid-lobbying-claims-and-competing-business-interests/) 6. T3 [https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-uganda-introduces-new-cheque-and-cash-withdrawal-limits-directs-banks-to-shift-to-digital-transactions/](https://www.ceo.co.ug/bank-of-uganda-introduces-new-cheque-and-cash-withdrawal-limits-directs-banks-to-shift-to-digital-transactions/) ** No modules match.** Filters combine as OR inside a group and AND across groups. ## Editorial metadata Provenance only. Nothing below gates publication or affects the render. Editorial metadata for Uganda| Field | Value | |---|---| | `trust.lawyer_review.status` | never_reviewed | | `trust.lawyer_review.reviewer` | no reviewer on record | | ` trust.content_source` | ai_generated | ## Provenance and declared absence **Disclosure model:** module cards load OPEN; standing positions render in full; sub-briefs and jurisdiction briefs load as a clamped teaser with an explicit “read full” control carrying the true word count; earlier updates stay collapsed behind a counted summary. No text is hidden without disclosing how much of it there is. **Sentinel-fed modules** receive no special rendering treatment. `sentinel_feed` is an attribution chip only: it does not suppress content, does not generate an absence reason code, and does not exclude the module from any count, filter, search index or export on this page. **Family taxonomy** is renderer-level presentation config, not a JID field. Colour is always duplicated in text and is never the sole carrier of meaning. **Suppressed by doctrine:** derived risk score; per-module RAG traffic light; `derived_scores` = `{"legal_accessibility": {"per_product": {"account_to_account": "regulated", "cards": "regulated", "prepaid_emoney": "licensed-emi"}}}`. **Band honesty:** uncertainty bands are computed against a frozen build clock of 2026-10-21. A year-precision row is never promoted into a tighter band. **Orphan deltas:** 1 cycle_delta row(s) target non-module objects and are listed in the rail rather than attached to a card. **Envelope:** baseline resolved at `jurisdiction_json.baseline`; 14 module(s), 73 finding(s), 35 source(s) in the cumulative register. Think something on this page is wrong? [Report an error](https://payments.gi/legal/#contact).